Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Is a Weekly Sabbath Day of Rest Good? Do We Need That Day?

Is a weekly day of rest good for us? Do we need that?

Yes. Various studies indicate that we humans function better if there is at least one day a week that we rest, do things differently than we do on the other days.

Furthermore, studies indicate it is better if we take the same day each week for that day of rest.

You can read about these studies online if you choose to.

The Bible Commandment to Keep the Sabbath

The original concept of virtually everyone  taking the same day each week for rest from work probably comes from Judaism. Taking a weekly day for rest is also one of the Ten Commandments many Christians seek to keep.

I remember reading the commandment in the Bible. Keeping the Sabbath is discussed in multiple places in the Bible, but Exodus 20:8-11 is the passage that seems to me to discuss it best. The Bible Gateway website is one of many places you can read those verses.

That Exodus passage instructs the Jews to rest on the last day of the week, the seventh day, just as God rested on the seventh day after six days of creation.

Since this article focuses on taking a weekly day of rest, I won't get into Creationism, how the Earth and life on it formed and how long it took.

However, it's reasonable to consider the Bible commandment as the root of the Sabbath Day of rest as we know it.

Below is a photo of a King James Version Bible my dad and mom gave me when I was a boy, probably in the late 1960s. It was my first  Bible. I've acquired several others of different versions since.


United States Blue Laws Regarding Sunday

Many places in the United States used to have what were called blue laws requiring most businesses to be closed on Sunday, the day of rest for most Christians who practice a weekly day of rest. When I started college here  in Lexington, Kentucky, the city had a blue law.

The Lexington law that kept most stores closed on Sundays has been done away with. Blue laws in other cities have largely been abolished over the years too.

Perhaps it's interesting to keep in mind that though the Sabbath Day of Judaism and the Old Testament of the Bible is Saturday, the seventh day of the week, the blue laws considered Sunday to be the day for rest from work.

Closing Thoughts

Regardless of your religious faith or lack of religious faith, it seems advisable to get at least one day of rest weekly. And it's preferable that it be the same day for persons every week.

Furthermore, when all or most persons enjoy the same day(s) off weekly, it facilitates fellowship and various activities together with one another.

Obviously hospitals, police forces, fire departments, and some other organizations must operate 24 hours a day every day.

But it might be nice if more of us did enjoy at least one day off in common with others each week, and it was the same day every week.

NOTE: This article was last revised on January 8, 2026.

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

Why Do People Use Earbuds So Much? What Do They Listen To?

During my childhood and early adult years in the 1970s and 1980s, transistor radios with wired earphones were popular.

I used one sometimes to listen to University of Kentucky sports events,  occasionally the news, and perhaps some music and other things.

But I don't think they were ever as common or popular as wireless earbuds are currently.

Now it seems that a large percentage, perhaps the majority in some cases, of persons I see  walking, jogging, and working are wearing wireless earbuds.

Many  earbuds even come with microphones.

What Do Folks Listen To?

Some individuals engage in lengthy phone conversations wearing earbuds. That's a key reason for microphones with them.

Others listen to music. Lots of people are big music lovers.

Some listen to sports events.

Others listen to podcasts.

Another use is to listen to material related to school or work. But I think that's a small percentage of usage.

Overall, there's much available to listen to. It’s amazing how much the Internet offers to listen to and to watch. 

Why Do Persons Use Earbuds So Much?

Some people feel the need for phone conversations with relatives, friends, coworkers, classmates, etc.  These conversations may be important. They also may not be, in many cases.

Others seem to dislike silence. They enjoy music as background noise to alleviate boredom doing routine tasks, to drown out other noises, or for some other reason. Perhaps they're big music lovers.

Others listen to podcasts that are educational, entertaining, or both.  In addition, many books are available in audio format.

Some persons may find earbuds a convenient way to listen to materials related to work and/or school.

Safety Issues With Listening to Earbuds

Hearing loss is one safety risk of using earbuds. A HealthPartners article [1] offers suggestions for using earphones safely to avoid harming your ears.

However, hearing loss is just one of the health risks of using earbuds and other types of earphones. Other harmful effects are potentially worse.

People are missing out on interpersonal conversations with companions or people they pass during their travels. They also miss the chance to enjoy quietly meditating, thinking about various things, and the joy of listening to the sounds of nature. In addition, they risk an accident by not being alert to dangers near them, such as traffic.

A 2022 Psychology Today article [2] states that listening to earbuds “is causing potentially irreparable damage to ourselves psychologically, emotionally, and socially.”

As for Myself   

I own a wireless Bluetooth earbud. I’ve had it for years. I’ve only worn it two or three times. My total time wearing it is probably less than one hour. It’s not my style.

Below is a photo I took of my Bluetooth earbud and its charging cable.


I also have multiple pairs of wired ear phones. I use them occasionally to listen to news or something else. But I don't use them often either.

Even when using my cellphone, I prefer reading news articles, etc., to listening to something.

Furthermore, I enjoy quietly meditating and thinking. The relative silence without earbuds or any other type of earphone or headphone allows me to plan, reflect, and when hiking or bicycling to experience the joys of the sounds of nature.

Furthermore, I consider it important to be alert to the sounds of traffic for safety purposes.

Closing Thoughts

I respect the right of persons to enjoy listening with earbuds, wired earphones, and/or headphones.

However, I think a lot of folks are missing out on a lot of opportunities to think, read, converse with others in person, and to enjoy the marvelous sounds of nature around them. Endangering their hearing is another problem, as is risking their safety by not being aware of nearby dangers.

I think the biggest risk is missing out on what I call the happiness or joy of "real" life by being attentive to sounds from an artificial ear piece instead. Please, let's seek to enjoy the real world around us.

DISCLOSURE: My second job is as a part-time retail store clerk. Some of the other employees, as well as some vendors to the store, use earbuds regularly.

NOTE:

This article was last revised on January 7, 2026.

ENDNOTES:

1 “How to Use Earbuds Without Damaging Your Ears”; HealthPartners; webpage accessed January 6, 2026; https://www.healthpartners.com/blog/how-to-use-earbuds-safely/

2 Taylor, Jim (reviewed by Michelle Quirk); “Listen Up: Why Earbuds Are a Threat to Ourselves and Society”; Psychology Today; August 30, 2022; webpage accessed January 6, 2026; https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-power-prime/202208/listen-why-earbuds-are-threat-ourselves-and-society/amp

Monday, January 5, 2026

Is Creating a Common International Language Feasible and Beneficial?

Creating an international language that enables almost everyone on Earth to communicate verbally and in writing with one another, without the need for a translator, seems like a marvelous idea.

But words in one language are often difficult to translate literally into another one. Translating all the words in all the languages on Earth into one may be virtually impossible.

Some Past Efforts at an International Language

At the time the United States was founded, French was arguably the closest thing to an international language. Invitations to events involving persons whose native tongues varied were often printed in French.

The common current practice of including the abbreviation RSVP (for a French phrase meaning "please respond" in English) on formal invitations in the United States likely goes back to that time when French played a leading role in international communication.

Currently English is arguably the closest thing to an international language. Many government and business functions are conducted in English in nations where various other languages are the countries' main languages.

Sign languages can also be considered a form of international communication among persons living in various nations who use the same sign language.

However, several different sign languages exist. An article on Avantpage 1 discusses various sign languages used in the United States.

Google Translate and cell phones with language translation capabilities are marvelous for helping persons with different languages communicate with one another. Such translation methods are not perfect, but they do pretty well.

Perhaps the best known constructed international language is Esperanto. It was created "in 1887 by Dr. L. L. Zamenhof" according to the Esperanto-USA website. 2 Various other sources cite the same year of creation and creator.

While many still hold high hopes for Esperanto, it has never attracted as many speakers as any of the numerous major world languages.

So far, efforts to create a common international language on Earth among humans seem to be unsuccessful.

My Efforts at Learning Other Languages

I only speak and write English. I respect persons who are fluent in multiple languages.

I took one year of Spanish in high school, but I know few Spanish words. I took one class in German for reading knowledge in college, and think I remember no German.

When I seek to understand words in another language, I turn to Google Translate on my cell phone or something else, such as a dictionary.

Below is a photo of some foreign language textbooks and dictionaries for translating between English and other languages that I own.


Could a Common Language Create Problems?

The Bible  (Genesis 11:1-9) tells of all persons on Earth sharing the same language and God altering their language to limit human potential. I don't claim to know if that account is literally true.

But what if modern-day people all used one language and united for some selfish, harmful purpose? The combined evil efforts of persons from different nations and cultures could indeed be horrendous, perhaps to places in the universe far beyond the Earth as well as to our planet.

Closing Thoughts

Maybe we ought to focus on creating universal morals and implementing them, rather than on creating an international language.

Attaining ethical behavior worldwide is preferable to attaining a common language worldwide. Could both be achieved together? I don't know.

As I see it, both are worthy goals. But both will remain out of reach in the near future, unless God intervenes on our behalf in some miraculous way. However, I do believe in God and in miracles.

NOTE:

This article was last revised on January 6, 2026.

ENDNOTES:

1 "Types of Sign Language Used in the United States"; Avantpage; 

2 "Esperanto-USA"; Esperanto-USA website; webpage accessed January 5, 2026; https://esperanto-usa.org/

Sunday, January 4, 2026

Public Libraries Contain Much: Let's Use Them More

Public libraries in the United States contain a wide variety of resources, as I discuss in the next section, using my local library as an example. Furthermore, data on the American Library Association * website states that there are over 16,000 public library buildings in the United States, including both branches and main libraries.

My Local Public Library

My local Lexington, Kentucky, public library has multiple branches. The library holds books, magazines, newspapers, DVDs, public computers with Internet access, photocopying machines, fax machines, meeting rooms, and more.

It even has a theater that occasionally shows free movies, hosts political debates, author talks, etc.

The main library includes one room used as a small art gallery. Its contents change periodically.

The library even hosts some music performances in its public areas, which I confess appeal less to me than to others.

The library offers laptop computers that can be checked out for use all day in the library.

My point is that Lexington's Public Library offers a lot of resources. Most of us could use more of those offerings more often. But we don't, often because we aren't aware of them.

Numerous activities for children and adults take place at the library each year.

The free Wi-Fi is a blessing. The availability of a scanner and a fax machine for public use come in handy for some too.

I probably use my local public library more than most people. But even I fail to come close to benefitting from all it offers.

Although the library contains several branches, I most often use the main location. It even includes a bookstore in its basement operated by the Friends of the Lexington Public Library. The bookstore contains thousands of used books in nice condition on various topics.

Below is a March 8, 2021, photo I took of one of the libraries I've used, the Northside Branch of the Lexington Public Library. The library is on the right in the background behind the colorful sign.

Other Public Libraries

Libraries in major cities like New York City and Chicago can offer even more things than the Lexington Public Library. I've enjoyed visiting the main libraries in both those cities, as well as some in other cities.

Below is a June 20, 2022, photo I took of the entrance to Chicago's main public library.

Even many relatively small public libraries are nice. For example, the public library in the southeastern Kentucky town of Jenkins where I graduated high school includes a nice selection of books, some magazines and newspapers, public computers with Internet access, a photocopier, a meeting room, and probably other things that I lack knowledge of.

Below is a September 4, 2011, photo I took of the Jenkins Public Library.

Also, interlibrary loans permit persons to obtain materials from other libraries that one's local library doesn't stock. Libraries also often subscribe to online databases that can provide resources not available at that particular facility.

If  you talk to your local library's staff, you may be amazed at what they can do for you. Please do try to not abuse their time and resources though.

Other Libraries

In addition to public libraries, college research libraries and other specialized libraries exist that can meet needs that public libraries are not designed for.

The massive Library of Congress in Washington, DC, contains an almost unimaginable wealth of materials.

I enjoy at least occasionally visiting the University of Kentucky main library here in Lexington to do reading and research. On a Washington, DC, visit I got to take a public tour of the Library of Congress. I saw an original copy of the Gutenberg Bible, among many other things.

Closing Thoughts

If you haven't recently visited your local public library, please consider doing so soon. If you already visit regularly, please consider using additional resources at the library and visiting more often.

ENDNOTE:

* "Library Statistics and Figures: Number of Libraries in the United States; last updated February 21, 2025, 2:26 p.m.; American Library Association; webpage accessed January 4, 2026; https://libguides.ala.org/c.php?g=751692&p=9132142


Saturday, January 3, 2026

Removal of Venezuela's Maduro: Correct Decision But Incorrect Way?

Today, Saturday, January 3, 2026, the United States removed Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro Moros from power, as reported by numerous news sources, including an article on The Hill. 1

Below is a photo of Maduro from a U.S. State Department August 7, 2025, online Wanted Poster.

More information about Maduro is on the U.S. Department of State webpage 2 with the Wanted Poster.

My View

As I see it, Maduro was an illegitimate ruler and removing him was appropriate. He apparently lost the 2018 election, and numerous countries refused to recognize him as Venezuela's president.

It would have been great if he'd voluntarily stepped down or been removed in some manner by a massive international force.

However, it is at best questionable whether United States President Donald John Trump had the authority to order unilateral U.S. action to remove Maduro.

Closing Thoughts

For better or worse, the United Nations lacks its own military force. Furthermore, any one of the five nations that are permanent members of the United Nations Security Council can veto a proposed action.

Since the UN lacks its own military, it's common practice, for better or worse, for nations with powerful militaries like the United States and Russia to take unilateral action.

Many in many countries called for Maduro's ouster. President Trump took action.

Whether in violation of the U.S. Constitution and international law or not, Trump ordered it, and it was done.

Let's hope the U.S. will now seek to help establish a quality legitimate government in Venezuela to run the country. Time will tell how it works out.

ENDNOTES:

1 Timotija, Filip; "Trump Says Maduro Captured, Flown Out As U.S. Military Conducts 'Large Scale' Strike"; The Hill; 5:12 a.m. ET, January 3, 2026; webpage accessed January 3, 2026; https://thehill.com/homenews/5670708-trump-captures-maduro-us-venezuela-strikes/

2 "Nicolas Maduro Moros"; U.S. Department of State; August 7, 2025; webpage accessed January 3, 2026; https://www.state.gov/nicolas-maduro-moros

Friday, January 2, 2026

Radio Is Flourishing: But Its Heyday Was Decades Ago

An Elon University article [1] and one on Radio King [2] are two of numerous pieces online that discuss the history of radio.

Though a form of radio developed in the 1800s, radio first became popular during the 1920s. The first public radio station, KDKA in Pittsburgh, began broadcasting in 1920. Others soon followed. Economic prosperity made radios affordable in the 1920s for the general public.

Radio’s use continued to expand in the 1930s and 1940s, as persons used it as a major source for news and entertainment.

Radio’s Golden Age occurred from the 1920s to the 1950s. Some sources narrow that range to the 1930s and 1940s. Radio’s heyday was in the 1940s according to various sources, including Britannica.[3]

Most Popular Radio Comedy

My dad told me that during his childhood Amos 'n' Andy was an enormously popular radio show. The show broadcast from the 1920s to 1960 according to History. [4] Various sources report it to be radio’s most popular comedy of all time.

The show’s racial stereotypes and use of two white persons to portray two black leading characters likely would not pass muster now. But this comedy was a hit. Many episodes of it are available online for viewing or can be purchased.

News and Entertainment

From the 1920s until television became popular in the 1950s, radio was perhaps the main form of household entertainment.

My mom told of her enjoyment listening on the radio to the show Beulah and to Christmas carols during her childhood. She mentioned her dad enjoying the evening news on the same radio. She said she’d get upset when her dad would sometimes switch the station to the one carrying the newscast before the end of Beulah.

A Couple of Memorable Radio Moments

Those who grew up listening to radio experienced memorable moments like the scare created by the fictional radio broadcast The War of the Worlds on October 30, 1938. The program created panic as many listeners thought a real Martian invasion was occurring, despite announcements during the program about it being fiction.

The announcement of the December 7, 1941, Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor is another of the many memorable moments. I cannot imagine what it must have been like listening to that news being  broadcast on radio.

My Childhood in the 1960s and 1970s

My childhood in the 1960s and 1970s included more television watching than radio listening. And I probably devoted more time to reading than to either.

We only got three major television networks, and typically only three different programs were on at a time.

However, after dark I could pick up a huge variety of radio stations in southeastern Kentucky where I lived, stations from New York City, Chicago, New Orleans, and many other cities.

I especially enjoyed listening to WHAS in Louisville in the early 1970s. The radio call-in show Metz Here, hosted by Milton Metz, facilitated discussion of a nice variety of topics. Metz allowed persons of different views to speak respectfully, without injecting his own viewpoint. I still think he’s the best talk radio show host I’ve ever heard. His show was entertaining and educational.

WHAS also broadcast University of Kentucky basketball and football games, as well as Kentucky Colonels ABA professional basketball games. Back in those early 1970s few games were broadcast on television. I was (and remain) a Kentucky sports fan.  

During the 1970s WHAS even began broadcasting a suspense radio drama, The CBS Radio Mystery Theater, a new broadcast, which gave me an idea of what my mom and dad listened to during their childhoods. In some cases I actually enjoyed being able to visualize scenes from the radio description and my imagination more than seeing similar programs on television.

I also occasionally listened to music on the radio, as well as news. Car radios were popular, and mom often listened to music on a radio station while doing housework.

Below is a photo of two of the AM-FM radios I own. Both are clock radios. The one on the bottom is one I received as a gift from dad and mom in the early 1970s. It’s over 50 years old. Its clock no longer works. But I still listen to the radio regularly.


    

Now

Despite the Internet, television, and video games, radio remains popular today.

I still listen to radio newscasts daily. I often listen to three different ones (NPR, ABC, and Fox) via three local radio stations here in Lexington, Kentucky.

I also sometimes listen to talk radio shows, Christmas music in season, and other things on the radio. A nice thing about radio is that I can be looking at something else while I'm listening, instead of focusing my eyes on a video screen.

But there is a decline in local news reporting on radio. Furthermore, large companies own huge numbers of radio stations, eliminating local ownership of many stations.

However, radio remains popular. Radio talk shows, music, news, sports, etc., attract significant audiences.

Millions of persons drive with car radios on and/or listen to the radio while doing things in their home. A 2023 Pew Research Center article [5] is one of many that discuss radio’s continuing popularity.   

ENDNOTES:


[1] “1890s-1930s: Radio”; Elon University; webpage accessed January 2, 2026; https://www.elon.edu/u/imagining/time-capsule/150-years/back-1890-1930/

[2] “Radio History: What You Need to Know”; Radio King; April 7, 2025; webpage accessed January 2, 2026; https://www.radioking.com/blog/radio-history/

[3] Skretvedt, Randy; “The Golden Age of American Radio”; webpage accessed January 2, 2026; https://www.britannica.com/topic/radio/Variety-shows

[4] “Original ‘Amos “n” Andy’ Debuts on Chicago Radio”; History; published November 24, 2009; last updated May 27, 2025; webpage accessed January 2, 2026; https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/january-12/original-amos-n-andy-debuts-on-chicago-radio

[5] Forman-Katz, Naomi; “For National Radio Day, key facts about radio listeners and the radio industry in the U.S.”; Pew Research Center; February 13, 2023; updated August 17, 2023; webpage accessed January 2, 2026; https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/17/for-national-radio-day-key-facts-about-radio-listeners-and-the-radio-industry-in-the-us/

Thursday, January 1, 2026

The Internet Versus the Print Media

Print media is declining. It has been for years. I miss it.

Please don’t get me wrong. I love the Internet. It enables me and others to access such a massive quantity of information and other resources that it’s almost unimaginable. If you’d told me about such a thing when I was in elementary school during the 1960s and 1970s, I’d have said it was impossible.

Things have changed. Indeed, I’m actually planning to post this article online.

A blog on the website Strikingly[1] is one of many online sources that compare print and digital media. An EBSCO article[2] is one of many that discuss the decline in newspapers.

I guess what I’d really love is for the entire Internet to be instantly available as a printed page. The Internet does offer more information than the print media ever did.

Newspapers

It’s faster and easier for me to read a print newspaper than to scroll through its pages online, even with the high-speed Internet at the public library or on my cell phone.

However, I confess that I cancelled my subscription to my local Lexington, Kentucky, Herald-Leader newspaper many years ago when it was still printed daily. I chose instead to read the print version at the library. The price had gone up, quality seemed to have declined, and my budget was limited.

In the years since, the newspaper first eliminated Saturday printed editions, then switched to only printing three days a week. The online version is available daily, is more comprehensive than the print version ever was, and can be read free online at the library. But it’s not the same. Turning those pages online takes precious time.

Magazines

Many print magazines are ceasing publication, reducing publication frequency, or going online only. However, I’m happy to report that I still receive a few printed magazines.

These include Reader’s Digest and Guideposts. But both magazines are now published six times a year, instead of every month as they were when I was a boy. Furthermore, those monthly issues of Reader’s Digest during my childhood contained over 200 pages each. The magazine now contains fewer than 150 pages per issue.

Both publications feature Internet sites with more information, but I hope and trust that their best stuff makes it into the printed copies. I seldom visit their websites.  

Books

While I love being able to read breaking news stories online, I dislike ebooks. I cherish my personal library of printed books, some of which are pictured below. I am blessed with many more than those pictured. I enjoy checking others out of the public library.


So far I haven’t found an online reference source that I like as much as my printed copy of The World Almanac and Book of Facts. It’s the best one-volume reference work I’ve found. I prefer it to buying the online version now available.

I own a copy of each annual almanac from 1975 when I was in high school to the 2026 version I received via Amazon in December.

I got each book new except for one that I bought used later. I was experiencing financial difficulties that year.

That makes 52 issues if you’re counting. In addition I also bought a used copy of one earlier issue published when I was a baby, making 53 total.

I may be wrong, but I’m confident that those annual almanacs contain a lot of information that can’t even be found on a Google Search.

Internet Trend Toward Paid Subscriptions

The Internet did spoil me over the years by providing free online access to a huge array of news sources. Alas, the online mainstream media now depends more on subscription income and less on advertising.

I can no longer read unlimited news articles free from the BBC, Reuters, CNN, Daily Mail, etc., etc. So far, I haven’t purchased a paid subscription to any of them.

I depend more on websites such as the Associated Press and local television station news sites that remain free so far.

I understand the fees. As a writer, I feel those who research, report, edit, and publish news deserve to be paid. It’s understandable that fees be instituted. I may even indulge in some paid online subscriptions at some point.

However, I'm hopeful that as Internet news website fees increase, the disparity in cost between producing online articles and print articles will decrease, leading to a resurgence for print media.

But that may be an unrealistic view. Paper and ink (or toner) cost money, as do delivery of printed copies. Electronic media production and transmission costs are cheaper.

Closing Thoughts

As a writer I do appreciate that an online article can be written, edited, and published easier, cheaper, and faster than doing so via a print magazine or newspaper.

As a reader I love the wealth of information available from local, national, and international sources online, including translations of materials originally written in other languages into English. Google Translate is great.

But printing and posting a copy of an online article on a bulletin board doesn’t seem the same as doing the same with scissors from a local newspaper. That’s true even if it is an article from a credible source. Yes, I do still have bulletin boards in my apartment.

If the Internet ever collapses due to server overloads, a computer virus, massive electrical outages, etc., those poking fun at those of us  "dinosaurs" who keep books may respect us more.

Even now, I trust reputable news organizations, such as major newspapers and magazines that maintain print versions, more than Internet social media or television news sources that seem to focus more on entertainment and sensationalism than mainstream newspapers traditionally did, though newspapers are changing.

Well-researched, well-written online articles can be just as credible as those in a major newspaper. But I think it’s especially important to be careful about sources online.

I optimistically think that over the long term we’ll get much of the best of both worlds. Internet information will flourish. Meanwhile, I believe (and hope) that hard copies of books will always be preferable to online versions for reference purposes.

After all, it’s easier to read a century old book (or even a century old newspaper article) at a library than to access an online book or article from last year on a website that has shut down. And I won’t get into trying to access an old article stored on a floppy disk.

Yes, let's enjoy the Internet. However, let's never seek to rely solely on it for information.   

ENDNOTES: 

[1] “Print Media vs. Digital Media: Which One is Better?’; The Strikingly Blog; Strikingly; August 2, 2023; webpage accessed December 31, 2025; https://www.strikingly.com/blog/posts/print-media-vs-digital-media-which-one-is-better

[2] ”Decline of Newspapers: Overview”; EBSCO; published in 2024; webpage accessed December 31, 2025; https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/communication-and-mass-media/decline-newspapers-overview